Expensive on Purpose

Free sample — the opening of Chapter 1, The Undercharger’s Trap. The complete book (82 pages, 11 chapters) comes as DRM-free PDF + EPUB with purchase.

Chapter 1: The Undercharger’s Trap

Maya Chen closed her laptop at 9:40 on a Friday night. Sixty hours that week. Two logo concepts, a full brand guidelines document, four client calls, one round of revisions she didn’t charge for because the client “just had a few small tweaks.” Then she opened her banking app, the way you press on a bruise to check if it still hurts. It did. After three years of freelance brand design, fully booked, referrals arriving without her asking, Maya was on track to earn about $52,000 this year. Less than her last salaried job. For more hours. With no paid vacation and a tax bill she has to remember herself.

Here’s the pattern, and it’s worth naming precisely: Maya is not underpaid because she’s bad at design, bad at business, or insufficiently confident. She’s underpaid because of the method she uses to set her prices — plus a layer of fear that keeps her from questioning the method. That’s the whole diagnosis. Not a personality flaw. A broken procedure, running on schedule, producing exactly the output it’s designed to produce.

This matters because personality flaws feel permanent and procedures don’t. If undercharging were humility, or imposter syndrome, or “just how I am,” you’d need therapy or a character transplant. If it’s a method, you need a better method. This book is the better method. This chapter is the diagnosis.

The two engines of a low price

Undercharging runs on two engines, and they reinforce each other.

The first engine is cost-plus pricing. Cost-plus means you start from your own side of the transaction — what the work costs you in time, tools, and overhead — and add a margin you can say out loud without flinching. It’s how Maya got to $65 an hour. She took her old salary, about $68,000, divided by roughly 2,000 working hours in a year, got $34, doubled it to feel like a business, and rounded down to a number she could say without her voice wavering. Sixty-five felt fair. It felt defensible. It had math in it.

Cost-plus isn’t wrong everywhere. It’s how commodity businesses price, and for a factory selling ball bearings it works fine, because a ball bearing’s value is roughly its cost plus a competitive margin. The problem is that you don’t sell ball bearings. You sell judgment, taste, and outcomes, and none of those cost you anything like what they’re worth to the person buying them. Cost-plus caps your price at “my costs, marked up politely” — no matter what the work produces on the other side. A rebrand that helps a client raise prices 20% and one that gets filed in a drawer cost Maya the same hours. Cost-plus charges them identically. That should bother you.

The second engine is money-talk aversion. Most people who sell their own expertise would rather redo a deliverable three times than say a large number out loud to another human. So when the moment comes to quote, they reach for the number that ends the discomfort fastest — which is always the low one. A low number gets a quick yes. A quick yes ends the money conversation. The relief is immediate and the cost is invisible, spread across the next eleven months of your bank balance.

Notice how the engines cooperate. Cost-plus generates a low number and dresses it in arithmetic. Aversion makes you grateful for any number you can justify without a negotiation. The math gives the fear an alibi. You don’t experience yourself as afraid; you experience yourself as reasonable. That’s why undercharging survives so long — it never presents as fear. It presents as fairness.

Both engines are fixable. The math engine gets replaced in Chapters 2 through 6 with pricing that starts from the client’s outcome instead of your costs. The fear engine gets replaced in Chapters 7 through 10 with scripts — actual words, written down, that you can say when your instincts want to flinch. You don’t have to become a different person. You have to run a different procedure.

The 2,000-hour delusion

Let’s go back to Maya’s arithmetic, because there’s a second error buried in it, and it’s the one that quietly bankrupts freelancers who think they’re doing fine.

Maya divided her target income by 2,000 hours — 50 weeks times 40 hours. That’s a salary number. Salaried people get paid for meetings, email, slow Tuesdays, and the twenty minutes spent staring at the ceiling. Freelancers get paid for billable hours only, and billable hours are a fraction of working hours.

Count what Maya’s 60-hour week actually contained. Client work she could invoice: about 34 hours. The rest: writing a proposal for a prospect who ghosted, two discovery calls, invoicing and chasing an overdue payment, updating her portfolio, a call with her accountant, posting work online because that’s where referrals come from, and the unbilled “small tweaks.” None of that is optional. All of it is unpaid.

The sample ends here. Buy Expensive on Purpose above to keep reading — one-time purchase, instant download, yours forever.