Britain’s largest unregulated corner of consumer lending is regulated now. Since 15 July 2026, any company offering buy-now-pay-later credit in the UK has been operating under the Financial Conduct Authority’s consumer-credit rules, and the eleven million people who use the product have acquired a set of statutory protections they did not have before. The change did not come with a bang: there was no single press release, no court filing, no public crisis. There was a registration window, a temporary permissions regime, and a go-live date that has already passed. Weeks into the new era, the framework is live and its mechanics are worth understanding.
BNPL, formally defined in UK legislation as deferred payment credit, grew from a marginal product into a mainstream one over a short period. A market worth around sixty million pounds in 2017 had reached over thirteen billion pounds in outstanding balances by 2024. That growth happened outside the regulatory perimeter that governs traditional consumer credit, which meant that the firms offering it were free of the affordability and disclosure requirements that apply to a personal loan or a credit card, and that borrowers had no right to take a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service if something went wrong. That combination drew sustained attention from debt-advice charities, consumer groups and Parliament. The legislation to close the gap was eventually made, and July 2026 was the date set for the FCA to begin supervising the sector.
What the rules now require
The protections that took effect on 15 July map onto the framework that applies to other consumer-credit products. Lenders must give borrowers clear, upfront information about their agreement, setting out when payments fall due, how much each instalment will be, and what happens if a payment is missed. That sounds basic, but it was not a legal requirement before: BNPL providers had wide latitude over how and when they disclosed the terms of an arrangement.
Affordability checks are now compulsory in proportion to the credit being offered. A lender must satisfy itself that a customer can repay before extending credit, and must be able to demonstrate that process to the regulator. The threshold for a proportionate check on a small BNPL transaction at checkout is not the same as for a five-thousand-pound personal loan, but some assessment is required, and the FCA has made clear that a box-ticking exercise will not satisfy the Consumer Duty, the cross-sector standard of consumer outcomes that BNPL firms are now also bound by.
When a borrower gets into difficulty, firms must now offer support and, where appropriate, direct them to free debt advice. That obligation closes a gap that was particularly sharp in BNPL: a product used disproportionately by younger consumers and by people who are already financially stretched, many of whom had no formal channel to raise a complaint or seek help when repayments went wrong.
The most visible new right is access to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Before regulation, a BNPL customer who believed they had been treated unfairly had no statutory ombudsman route; their only options were the firm’s internal complaints process or the civil courts. Since 15 July, a complaint that the firm does not resolve to the customer’s satisfaction can be referred to the Ombudsman. The FOS has the power to award compensation of up to the relevant consumer-credit limit. That is a meaningful shift in leverage for a borrower in a dispute.
The firms in the new regime
The FCA set a registration window between 15 May and 1 July 2026. Firms that registered before the deadline received temporary permissions, allowing them to continue offering BNPL while they pursue full authorisation. Those that did not register cannot enter new deferred-payment credit agreements. Among those confirmed as operating under temporary permission are Clearpay, one of the largest providers by customer numbers, and a range of smaller lenders. Fifteen firms received temporary permission approval in the initial cohort.
Full authorisation is not a rubber stamp. It requires a firm to meet the FCA’s threshold conditions, demonstrate that it has the people, systems and financial resources to operate under the consumer-credit regime, and embed the ongoing obligations of the Consumer Duty into its processes. The deadline for completing that process is approximately six months after go-live, which means that by January 2027, every firm currently operating under temporary permission must have obtained full authorisation or exit the market. That is the harder gate the sector now faces: not the July go-live, which the larger players had been preparing for over several years, but the January authorisation crunch.
What changes for borrowers now
For the eleven million people who use BNPL, the practical changes are less dramatic in the short term than the legal shift might suggest. The most common BNPL transaction, a low-value purchase split into three or four instalments over weeks, will look broadly the same at checkout. The difference is in what happens when it goes wrong. A missed payment that previously triggered an escalating series of automated reminders with no formal complaints route now sits inside a regulated framework in which the lender has a documented duty of care and the borrower has a defined escalation path.
Over time the affordability-check requirement is likely to produce the larger change. As lenders build formal assessment into their checkout flows, the product will become harder to access for borrowers who are already over-extended. That is precisely the regulatory intent. Whether it produces the unintended consequence of pushing financially stretched consumers toward unregulated alternatives is a question the FCA has said it will monitor, and it is the space that consumer groups and debt advisers will be watching most closely as the new regime settles in.
The weeks since 15 July are too short for any verdict on outcomes. But the legal framework is in place, the clock on full authorisation is running, and a sector that spent years operating outside the rules that govern comparable products is now inside them.
Sources: Financial Conduct Authority: Regulating Buy Now Pay Later page (go-live date 15 July 2026; temporary permissions regime; definition of deferred payment credit); FCA press release, New protections confirmed for Buy Now Pay Later borrowers (eleven million users; market growth from sixty million pounds in 2017 to over thirteen billion pounds in 2024; transparency, affordability, support and Financial Ombudsman Service access requirements; registration window 15 May to 1 July 2026; six-month TPR window to approximately January 2027 for full authorisation); Consumer Duty framework applying to BNPL firms from go-live; PKF Littlejohn and Grant Thornton regulatory summaries confirming the firm authorisation and registration timeline.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.